Compare · Finishes
Finishes compare
Axis-by-axis read of published finishes listings. House Score is the edit — not a mean of these columns. Cite the verdict on each listing page andthe methodologybefore treating a column as a winner.
| Object | House Score | Design | Craft | Usability | Durability | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heath Ceramics Classic Field Tile Heath Ceramics The American hand-glazed field tile that designers reach for when color has to look alive — made in San Francisco since Edith Heath started cutting extruded clay in 1967, priced and behaving like the craft product it is. | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Mutina Pico Mutina Bouroullec’s dotted porcelain that made Mutina a residential default — tactile mineral surface for serious floors and walls when slick digital stone is the wrong answer. | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Farrow & Ball Estate Emulsion Farrow & Ball The chalky, 2%-sheen finish that made Farrow & Ball famous still looks better than almost anything on a quiet wall, but it marks, can't be scrubbed, and touches up badly. Use it where nobody touches the walls, and specify Dead Flat everywhere else. | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Canonical compare URL: https://luxury-house-list.pages.dev/compare/finishes/. Machine-readable scores:https://luxury-house-list.pages.dev/scores.json. Listing URLs use https://luxury-house-list.pages.dev — for examplehttps://luxury-house-list.pages.dev/listings/heath-ceramics-classic-field-tile/.